Lord of The Rings/Kite Runner Compare and Contrast Essay

What objects do you associate sin littleness with? Marriage, virginity, a puerility toy? When we view of dominance we work out of fightfare we think of negativity. When the phrase agnate regulate draws to mind, we go to our starts tucking us into issue and watching the game with our donsat least(prenominal) that is what us lucky ones think of. non every(prenominal)one is lucky enough to sport that pureness stored forever, gaga free lives, and a m some other and father by our side.The increase offset and Lord of the Flies consider legion(predicate) similarities, particularly when comparing themes such as loss of whiteness, advocate and dominance, and paternal twists and the shipway in which they are depicted by dint of symbolism and irony. From the beginning of The increase start Hoseinni showed naturalness by amirs passion and longing for increases, provided non some(prenominal) kite emeer longed for the winsome kite in the annual kite flying tourna ment. increases were constantly present during ameers childhood. They were his rectitude and his morality the slap-upness and purity of Afghanistan at that time.amirs innocence was stolen by him when he was twelve-years-old by the vicinity swagger, Assef. amir longed for the winning kite, unless at the expense of his friend, Hassan But on that point were two things amid the garbage that I couldnt tick off looking at One was the blue angel kite resting against the wall, (75). Amir witnessed the rape of Hassan, and after he took his trophy kite national and hung it up on the wall it mocked him, reminding him of his cowardice, and the purity and the innocence that were interpreted from him. When Amir returned to capital of Afghanistan as an adult there were no kites.Afghanistan had been run over by the Taliban and everything had been destroyed, besides equivalent the innocence that was taken by Amir and the goodness and that was stolen from him. In The Kite smuggler, Ami r wanted the winning kite. later on witnessing the rape of Hassanwitnessing his beloved friend relinquish himself for the first place kite and eyesight Kabul in ruin with the kites gone(p) and the tournaments ended, he craves the innocence and goodness of his past. In Lord of the Flies, Golding used symbols very alike to Hoseinnis use of the kite as a symbol of innocence.Instead of an object or toy, Golding used Simon to show purity. Simon, the quiet and considerate hearted male child, was polish off savagely by his peers. Simon had been the good and the innocent on the island unlike the other boys he knew that the evil was inside of the others, though he himself had been too good for the evil. Simon was taken away from the boys but not by outsiders, like the Taliban the boys themselves took Simon away, unlike The Kite set-back where Assef and the Taliban took the innocence away from Amir. There were no playscripts, and no movements but the tearing of dentition and claws ( 153).The boys turned into savages and took Simon away from themselves. Unlike The Kite Runner, Simon and innocence were not wanted and were soft thrown away. As goodness was existence murdered, the boys turned into monsters. Not once did they think of what was organism depleted. Another theme dowry by the two novels is the idea of somebodynel and dominance. In The Kite Runner, Hoseinni showed this through the bully Assef, who later became a Taliban official. Not solo(prenominal) did Hoseinni use Assef and the Taliban as symbols of force out, but he enforced them through irony.One example of hammy irony in The Kite Runner took place when Baba was talking to Amir as a child. Baba said to him, paragon tending us all if Afghanistan ever move into their hands (17). Baba was referring to the Taliban and how he hoped they would never come into power, though consequently, the Taliban later dominate Afghanistan. Baba pleads to God for help if the Taliban run over, he pleads to a God that he doesnt necessarily believe in, and ironically, the Taliban justify all of their actions with the word of God. Likewise, Golding used Jack and his hunters to illustrate power and dominance in Lord of the Flies.In put to assert their dominance Jack and his hunters murdered the pig in an ostentatious modal value thinking that macrocosm flashy and good will commence respect. Not only did Jack allege his power through conspicuous hunting acts, but he also imposed power with his violent mannerisms towards Ralph, Piggy, and the others. Jack is not the only power figure in this story. In turn, the British official that appeared to rescue the boys has a height of power along with the British army. Golding uttered his love of irony with the British pass on the island as well.The boys had been creating their own war on the island, and they were, in a way, mimicking the war that had been happening on a world-wide scale. Golding did not stop here, as the British pass and so o bserved the boys savagery, he reprimanded them for not being more proper and British. I should welcome thought that a syndicate of British boysyoure all British, arent you? would substantiate been qualified to put up a better show than that (202). How ironic, that patronage the soldiers talk of being proper and English, he too was being a savage. He too, was in the center field of a war.Not only do The Kite Runner and Lord of the Flies share themes of innocence and power, but they both impact in the lack of haughty enate influence. In The Kite Runner, Amir envied the father-son relationship that Hassan and his believed-to-be-father, Ali, shared. Like his stolen innocence, Amir yearned for his fathers approval, for these were the things he could not have. Hed close the door, leave me to wonder wherefore it was always grown-ups time with him (5). Here, Hoseinni clearly illustrates that as growing up, and even as an adult, Amir never received the love and the love that he so craved from his father.At every turn he would find a closed door Baba would see Amir as a calamity. The one person who gave Amir positive enate influence was his fathers friend and bloodline partner, Rahim Kahn. Amir did not take this influence to heart his longing for approval from Baba and a mother he did not have created a hole that Rahim Kahn could not fill. With a deceased mother and apathetic father, Amir had a deep hunger for a father figure to such a degree that the lack of a parental influence caused self ravaging and mental instability. In contrast to The Kite Runner, the boys in Lord of the Flies did not occupy for paternal influences as Amir did.In fact, they rejoiced because there were no adults on the island to keep them in check Arent there any grownups at all? I move intot think so. The fair boy said this solemnly but then delight of a realized competition overcame him (8). From the start, Amir wanted the parental influences that he grew up without the boys on the island were more than skilful to be rid of them. The consequences of the lack of parental influence did not make an show right away, but contrary to what the boys believed, not having a parental figure did have its repercussions.One can take Roger, in consideration. At first he could not bring himself to throw stones at the smaller, younger boys. The memories of nuance and punishments still had their hold on him, but as the story progresses, Roger finds himself becoming less and less humane much like Assef, in The Kite Runner, who as a child, subconsciously knew he could be punish for his bullying, but as he grew one-time(a) and as the influence of his parents lessened, he was able to use his wrath however he pleased.The lack of parental influence in Lord of the Flies through the immature, immature behavior of the boys and lack of adults residing on the island leads to destruction and chaos, similar in ways to that of Amirs, but far more outwardly dramatic. Indeed, Gold ing and Hoseinni share many tastes when it comes to writing, and that becomes quite unmistakable when one looks at the themes of the two novels. finished the loss of innocence, power and dominance, and the lack of those positive parental influences Golding and Hoseinni manage to paint the count on of a invigoration different than the life of the average American youth.Amir kept his innocence in a kite. In his homeland. The boys on the island never knew that their innocence lay inwardly one small boy. They didnt have a father to look up to, a mother to run to, and incomplete did Amir. Now, innocence is mocked. Parental figures are pushed away, but most dont screw what it is like to lose that innocence. To not have a mother or father there in times of need. Where is your innocence stored? Where do you find the comfort and breastplate that are craved through a mothers love and a fathers adoring pluck?